![]() FCT Insurance Company Ltd. (Prior to joining Lenczner Slaght. Noron Inc., 2019 NBCA 43 file opened (38799) John Breen v. MediaTube Corp v Bell Canada Counsel to the moving party in a motion for disqualification of counsel based on a law firm’s duty of loyalty to a large corporate client. and NorthVu Inc., both based in Toronto, sued Bell Canada and Bell Aliant Regional Communications, in Federal Court. Bell Canada, 2019 FCA 176 file opened (38797) City of Dieppe v. (CN) Two technology firms sued Bell Canada for 350 million in royalties, claiming it violated patent on Internet Protocol television technology. On January 29, 2018, MediaTube filed a notice of motion seeking (i) a declaration that these exhibits and transcripts are part of the public domain, and (ii) an Order that they be made available to the public. City of Winnipeg, et al., 2019 MBCA 70 file opened (38796) MediaTube Corp. ![]() On December 29, 2017, shortly after its present counsel was retained, MediaTube objected for the first time to the confidential treatment of the exhibits and transcripts in issue. We position your brand at the heart of cultural moments and provide experiential solutions to continually engage your. The trial took place in September and October of 2016 before me. The action concerned Bell’s Internet Protocol Television services called FibeTV and FibreOP TV. In 2013, they commenced an action against Bell Canada (Bell) for infringement of that patent. (MediaTube) are owner and licensee, respectively, of Canadian Patent No. Automatically generated summary: NorthVu Inc. Lawyers for the two plaintiffs declined to provide comment on the case.Mediatube Corp. "MediaTube continued to seek capital to commercialize its IPTV service, but this effort has been impeded severely by the fact that Bell Canada is providing the same service in Ontario and Quebec (its licensed territory) in competition with MediaTube." Since the launch of Bell Fibe, "MediaTube's business prospects diminished considerably," reads the court filing. (Bell Canada's parent company, BCE Inc., owns a 44 per cent stake in Bell Aliant.) Discover, match and monitor your eCommerce. Categories Featured About Register Login Submit a product. Since it uses equipment similar to Bell Canada's, the plaintiffs allege that it too is infringing certain claims of the 477 Patent. Compare YTWatcher VS MediaTube and find out whats different, what people are saying, and what are their alternatives. "We believe the claim is without merit and intend to strongly defend that position."īell Aliant offers IPTV services in Newfoundland and Labrador, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and parts of northern Ontario. "We are confident the claim is without merit and will strongly defend our position in court," said Bell Canada in an e-mailed statement on Wednesday. None of the allegations has been proved in court. As a result, at trial, MediaTube made two major admissions. ![]() In the months leading up to the trial, Bell corrected some of the answers it gave during discoveries concerning its Fibe TV and FibreOp TV systems. Bell Canada 2018 FC 355 Locke J 2,339,447 / Internet Protocol Televsion / Fibe TV, FibreOp This decision raises a couple of interesting points regarding procedure and substantive law of confidentiality orders. (Bell latersigned a confidentiality agreement with another company that was working with NorthVu to commercialize IPTV that company was acquired by MediaTube in 2009.)įollowing those years of collaboration, which included the use of Bell's telephone lines for a prototype IPTV system in Ontario, the plaintiffs claim Bell Canada launched its own service marketed as Fibe in Ontario and Quebec starting in September, 2010, infringing on their patent. Bell denied infringement and asserted that the claims of the 477 Patent were invalid. Monday, ApFormal Confidentiality Order Not Always Required MediaTube Corp. The telecom later began "confidential discussions" with NorthVu in early 2004 after it acquired the technology. The suit alleges that Bell Canada first approached the patent's inventor, Ross Jeffery, with an "unsolicited request to discuss his work" back in 1999.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |